Menu Home
| EDITORIAL BOARD |
| REVIEWERS |
| AUTHORS GUIDELINES |
| PEER REVIEW PROCESS |
| FOCUS AND SCOPE |
| PUBLICATION ETHICS |
| COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM |
| AUTHOR FEES |
| OPEN ACCESS POLICY |
|
TEMPLATE |
|
Google Scholar
|
|
GARUDA
|
|
DOI CROSREFF
|
|
RJI
|
All manuscripts submitted to INTEGRA undergo a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific contribution of published articles.
The review process consists of the following stages:
Initial Editorial Screening
The Editorial Team evaluates the manuscript for compliance with the journal's focus and scope, formatting requirements, and publication ethics standards.
Similarity Check
Manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software. Manuscripts with a similarity index exceeding 20% may be returned to the author or rejected.
Double-Blind Peer Review
Eligible manuscripts are reviewed by at least two independent reviewers. Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.
Review Evaluation
Reviewers assess:
Originality
Relevance
Scientific contribution
Research methodology
Clarity of presentation
Quality of references
Editorial Decision
Based on reviewers' recommendations, the Editor may decide:
Accept
Minor Revision
Major Revision
Reject
Final Decision
The Editor in Chief makes the final publication decision after considering reviewer feedback and author revisions.
The average review process is expected to take between 4 and 8 weeks.
Menu Home
| EDITORIAL BOARD |
| REVIEWERS |
| AUTHORS GUIDELINES |
| PEER REVIEW PROCESS |
| FOCUS AND SCOPE |
| PUBLICATION ETHICS |
| COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM |
| AUTHOR FEES |
| OPEN ACCESS POLICY |
|
TEMPLATE |
|
Google Scholar
|
|
GARUDA
|
|
DOI CROSREFF
|
|
RJI
|